Magnetic susceptibility of inclined soils and its relationship with some agronomic indicators

Oleksandr Kruglov, Oleksandr Menshov, Lidiia Horoshkova, Bohdan Kruhlov
Abstract

The modern agricultural complex requires the use of new methods for determining soil characteristics for adequate information support of the latest technologies, which is often impossible to provide using conventional methods. The purpose of the study is to identify the informative value of magnetometric methods in determining slope processes that regulate the use of certain measures to increase soil fertility and protect soils from erosion. The study was conducted on inclined agricultural landscapes of the Kharkiv region. This study used a KLY-2 Kappabridge (Czech Republic) and an Ohaus 403 laboratory scale to determine magnetic susceptibility. The selected soil samples, in accordance with the accepted methods, were brought to an air-dry state under normal conditions. Soil sampling was conducted from a layer of 0-20 cm. Visualisation of the study results and determination of potential soil losses (USLE model) was performed in the QGis programme. The correlation of magnetic susceptibility on simple and complex slopes was analysed. It was established that on simple slopes, the value of the magnetic susceptibility of the soil has a high value of this indicator with the content of physical clay and organic carbon. Therewith, there is a high degree of connection of this indicator with the results of mathematical modelling of erosion processes (USLE). For complex sections of slopes, the method is correct only for transeluvial landscapes, while for accumulative landscapes, the mentioned connection disappears. The correlation coefficient in the humus content – magnetic susceptibility pair also decreases. This is due to the alternation of washout–accumulation zones and exits of soil-forming rocks in runoff basins, the existence of which is not provided for by the procedure for applying the USLE model of potential soil losses. The use of soil MS data has a high potential for the localisation of soil inhomogeneities associated with the differentiation of humus content and granulometric composition

Keywords

soil; magnetic properties; chernozems; organic carbon; slope

Suggested citation
Kruglov, O., Menshov, O., Horoshkova, L., & Kruhlov, B. (2023). Magnetic susceptibility of inclined soils and its relationship with some agronomic indicators. Plant and Soil Science, 14(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.31548/plant1.2023.39
References

[1] Alekseeva, T., Sokolowska, Z., Hajnos, M., Alekseev, A., & Kalinin, P. (2009). Water stability of aggregates in subtropical and tropical soils (Georgia and China) and its relationships with the mineralogy and chemical properties. Eurasian Soil Science, 42, 415-425. doi: 10.1134/ S1064229309040085.

[2] Barbosa, R.S., Marques Júnior, J., Barrón, V., Martins Filho, M.V., Siqueira, D.S., Peluco, R.G., Camargo, L.A., & Silva, L.S. (2019). Prediction and mapping of erodibility factors (USLE and WEPP) by magnetic susceptibility in basalt-derived soils in northeastern São Paulo state, BrazilEnvironmental Earth Sciences, 78(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-8015-0.

[3] Borgne, E (1955). Susceptibilite Magnetique anormal du sol susperficiel. Annales de Geophysique, 4, 399-419.

[4] Borgne, E (1960). Influence du feu sur les propreetes magnetiques du sol et sur celles du schiste et du graniteAnnales de Geophysique, 16, 159-195.

[5] Byndych, T. (2017). Using Multispectral Satellite Imagery for Parameterisation of Eroded Chernozem . Soil Science Working for a Living, 57-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45417-7_5.

[6] de Jong, E., Nestor, P.A., & Pennock, D.J. (1998). The use of magnetic susceptibility to measure long-term soil redistribution. Catena, 32(1), 23-35. doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(97)00051-9.

[7] de Souza Bahia, A.S.R., Marques, J., La Scala, N., Pellegrino Cerri, C.E., & Camargo, L.A. (2017). Prediction and mapping of soil attributes using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibilitySoil Science Society of America Journal, 81(6), 1450-1462.

[8] Dearing, J.A. (1999). Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility, Using the Bartington MS2 System. Second edition. London: Chi Publishing.

[9] Dearing, J.A., Dann, R.J.L.,Hay, K., Lees, J.A., Loveland, P.J., Maher, B. A., & O’Grady, K. (1996). Frequency-dependent susceptibility measurements of environmental materials. Geophysical Journal International, 124, 228-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb06366.x.

[10] DSTU ISO 14235:2005. (2007). Soil quality – Determination of organic carbon in soil by sulfochromic oxidation. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart.

[11] Evans, M., & Heller, F. (2007). Environmental magnetism: principles and applications of enviromagnetics. London: Academic Press.

[12] Garbacea, G.F., & Ioane, D. (2010). Geophysical mapping of soils. New data on Romanian soils based on magnetic susceptibility. The Journal of Geophysics, 54, 83-95.

[13] Gholamzadeh, M., Ayoubi, S., & Shahrivar, F.S. (2019). Using magnetic susceptibility measurements to differentiate soil drainage classes in central Iran. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 63(3), 465484. doi: 10.1007/s11200-018-0679-0.

[14] Gуrka-Kostrubiec, B., Teisseyre-Jeleńska, M., & Dytłow, S.K. (2016). Magnetic properties as indicators of Chernozem soil development. Catena, 138, 91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.catena .2015.11.014.

[15] Jakšík O., Kodešová R., Kapička A., Klement A., Fer M., & Nikodem A. (2016) Using magnetic susceptibility mapping for assessing soil degradation due to water erosion. Soil and Water Research, 11(2), 105-113. doi: 10.17221/233/2015-SWR.

[16] Jimenez, A., Cristian, et al. (2017). Relationship between physical properties and the magnetic susceptibility in two soils of Valle del CaucaRevista de Ciências Agrárias, 34(2), 33-45.

[17] Jones, R., Beaver, A.H. (1964). A technique for magnetic susceptibility determination of soil material. Soil Science Society of America, 28, 47-49. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1964.

[18] Jordanova, N. (2016). Soil magnetism. Cambridge: Academic Press.

[19] Kruglov, O., Menshov, O., Kolada, V., Achasova, A., & Andreeva, O. (2021). Integrating of geophysical and agrochemical methods for slope lands studying. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 3(94), 53-58. doi: 10.17721/1728-2713.94.06.

[20] Kruglov, O., Menshov, O., Ulko, E., Kucher, A., & Nazarok, P. (2018). Soil erosion indication by magnetic methods in Kharkiv region. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 3(82), 36-44. doi: 10.17721/1728-2713.82.05.

[21] Lecoanet, H., Léveque, F., & Ambrosi, J.P. (2003) Combination of magnetic parameters: An efficient way to discriminate soilcontamination sources (south France). Environmental Pollution, 122(2), 229-234. doi: 10.1016/ S0269-7491(02)00299-3.

[22] Liu, L., Zhang, K., Zhang, Z., & Qiu Q. (2015). Identifying soil redistribution patterns by magnetic susceptibility on the black soil farmland in Northeast China. Catenа129, 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j. catena.2015.03.003.

[23] Long, X., Ji, J., & Balsam W. (2011). Rainfalldependent transformations of iron oxides in a tropical saprolite transect of Hainan Island, South China: Spectral and magnetic measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, article number F03015. doi: 10.1029/2010JF001712, 2011.

[24] Lyons, R., Oldfield, F., & Williams, E. (2010). Mineral magnetic properties of surface soils and sands across four North African transects and links to climatic gradients. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11, article number Q08023. doi: 10.1029/2010GC003183.

[25] Maher, B.A. (1986). Characterisation of soils by mineral magnetic measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 42 (1-2), 76-92. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9201(86)80010-3.

[26] Maxbauer, D.P., Feinberg, J.M., Fox, D.L., & Nater, E.A. (2017). Response of pedogenic magnetite to changing vegetation in soils developed under uniform climate, topography, and parent material. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17722-2.

[27] Menshov, O., Kruglov, O. & Sukhorada, A. (2012). Informational content of the soil magnetism indicators for solving agrogeophysical and soil science tasks. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 3, 7-12.

[28] Menshov, O., Kruglov, O., Vyzhva, S., Horoshkova, L., Pereira, P., Pastushenko, T., & Dindaroglu, T. (2021). Landscape Position Effects on Magnetic Properties of Soils in the Agricultural Land Pechenigy, Ukraine. Earth Systems and Environment, 5(3), 739-750. doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00240-7.

[29] Menshov, O., Kruglov, O., Vyzhva, S., Nazarok, P., Pereira, P, & Pastushenko, T (2018). Magnetic methods in tracing soil erosion, Kharkov Region, Ukraine. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 62(4), 681-696. doi: 10.1007/s11200-018-0803-1.

[30] Moritsuka, N., Matsuoka, K., Katsura, K., Sano, S., & Yanai, J. (2021). Laboratory and field measurement of magnetic susceptibility of Japanese agricultural soils for rapid soil assessment. Geoderma, 393, article number 115013. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115013.

[31] Peluco, R.G., Marques Junior, J., Siqueira, D.S., Pereira, G.T., Barbosa, R.S., Teixiera, D.B., Adame, C.R., & Cortez, L.A. (2013). Soil magnetic susceptibility and estimation of support capacity for vine application. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 48, 661-672. doi: 1590/S0100-204X2013 000600012.

[32] Pourmasoumi, M., Khormali, F., Ayoubi, S., Kehl, M., & Kiani, F. (2019). Development and magnetic properties of loess-derived forest soils along a precipitation gradient in northern Iran. Journal of Mountain Science, 16, 1848-1868. doi: 10.1007/s11629-018-5288-4.

[33] Quijano, L., Chaparro, M. A. E., Marié, D. C., Gaspar, L., & Navas, A. (2014). Relevant magnetic and soil parameters as potential indicators of soil conservation status of Mediterranean agroecosystems. Geophysical Journal International, 198, 1805-1817. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu239.

[34] Radaković, M.G., Gavrilov, M.B., Hambach, U., Schaetzl, R.J., Tošić, I., Ninkov, J., & Marković, S.B. (2019). Quantitative relationships between climate and magnetic susceptibility of soils on the Bačka Loess Plateau (Vojvodina, Serbia). Quaternary International, 502, 85-94. doi: org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.04.040.

[35] Ramos, P.V., Siqueira, D.S., Dalmolin, R.S.D., Almeida, J.Ad, Júnior, J.M., & Moura Bueno, J.M. (2017). Magnetic susceptibility of soil to differentiate soil environments in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 41, article number e0160189. doi: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20160189.

[36] Sadiki, A., Faleh, A., Navas, & Bouhlassa, S. (2009). Using magnetic susceptibility to assess soil degradation in the Eastern Rif, Morocco. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34, 2057-2069. doi: 10.1002/esp.1891.

[37] Santos, H.L., Marques Júnior, J., Matias, S.S.R., Siqueira, D.S., & Martins Filho, M.V. (2013). Erosion factors and magnetic susceptibility in differet compartments of a slope in Gilbués-PI, Brazil. Engenharia, Agrícola, 33(1), 64-74. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69162013000100008.

[38] Wang, H, Huo Y, Zeng, L, Wu, X, & Cai, Y. (2008). A 42-yr soil erosion record inferred from mineral magnetism of reservoir sediments in a small carbonate-rock catchment, Guizhou Plateau, southwest China. Journal of Paleolimnology, 40, 897-921. doi: 10.1007/s1093 3-008-9206-6.