Plant and Soil Science

Nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-mobilising bacteria improve photosynthetic activity and productivity of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench)

Liubov Honchar, Bohdan Mazurenko
Download article
Abstract

One effective way to increase the yield of agricultural crops is pre-sowing seed treatment with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-mobilising bacteria. The specific features of productivity formation in buckwheat restrict the planned yield and the realisation of varietal potential, leading to an increase in vegetative growth indicators at the early stages of growth and development. The research was conducted on three buckwheat cultivars during 2022-2023 under the conditions of the forest-steppe zone of Ukraine. This study aimed to determine the effect of seed treatment on the content of photosynthetic pigments, biomass accumulation, and leaf area index in buckwheat during the generative period of development. It was found that the influence on biomass growth from mid- flowering to fruit formation was limited, though different trends in the formation of photosynthetic pigments in leaves were observed. The biopreparations significantly increased the content of photosynthetic pigments at the budding stage (BBCH 51), mainly due to chlorophyll a, while at the flowering stage (BBCH 65), phosphate-mobilising complexes were most effective. It was established that seed treatment with nitrogen-fixing bacteria enabled buckwheat to form a leaf area index of 5.27-5.48 at the fruit formation stage, which was significantly higher compared with the control (4.19). At the same time, biomass accumulation during the generative period changed insignificantly across the seed treatment options, but morphological changes were noted that contributed to higher yields and, consequently, greater productivity. It was established that pre-sowing seed treatment has a significant effect on biometric indicators and yield, though the varietal factor often manifests itself, indicating the prospects for further research into evaluating the formation of the buckwheat generative apparatus under the influence of microbiological preparations

Keywords

chlorophyll content; dry matter; leaf area index; net photosynthetic productivity; yield

Suggested citation
Honchar, L., & Mazurenko, B. (2025). Nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-mobilising bacteria improve photosynthetic activity and productivity of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Plant and Soil Science, 16(3), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.31548/plant3.2025.42
References
  1. Almashova, V.S., & Skok, S.V. (2022). Effectiveness of application of biological preparations and plant growth regulators for growing agricultural crops in the Southern Steppe zone of Ukraine. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 47(1), 11-17. doi: 10.32845/agrobio.2022.1.2.
  2. Breslauer, R., Nalbandian, E., Reinman, T., Rezaey, M., Ganjyal, G.M., & Murphy, K.M. (2023). Buckwheat production and value-added processing: A review of potential western Washington cropping and food system applications. Sustainability, 15(20), article number 14758. doi: 10.3390/su152014758.
  3. Chen, M. (2014). Chlorophyll modifications and their spectral extension in oxygenic photosynthesis. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 83(1), 317-340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-162943.
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, May). Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/.
  5. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1973, March). Retrieved from https://cites.org/eng.
  6. Dykyi, O., Lykhochvor, V., & Bahay, T. (2022). Influence of mineral fertiliser and foliar dressing rates on buckwheat yield. Scientific Horizons, 25(2), 47-54. doi: 10.48077/scihor.25(2).2022.47-54.
  7. Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G.A., & Waines, J.G. (2008). Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Research, 106(1), 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.012.
  8. Guglielmini, A.C., Forcat, J.I., & Miralles, D.J. (2019). The critical period for yield determination in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). European Journal of Agronomy, 110, article number 125933. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125933.
  9. Honchar, L., Mazurenko, B., Shutyi, O., Pylypenko, V., & Rakhmetov, D. (2021). Effect of pre-seed and foliar treatment with nano-particle solutions on seedling development of tiger nut (Cyperus Esculentus L.) plants. Agronomy Research, 19(S1), 767-776. doi: 10.15159/ar.21.021.
  10. Honchar, L., Mazurenko, B., Sonko, R., Kyrpa-Nesmiian, T., Kovalenko, R., & Kalenska, S. (2020). Biochemical responses of 5 buckwheat (Fagopirum esculentum Moench.) cultivars to seed treatment by Azospirillum brasilense. Agronomy Research, 18(SI3), 1680-1688. doi: 10.15159/ar.20.080.
  11. Hudzovskyi, A., Demianenko, I., & Levtun, I. (2024). The impact of metal oxide-based nanofertilisers on the physicochemical properties of agricultural plants. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15(3), 28-40. doi: 10.31548/biologiya/3.2024.28.
  12. Karbivska, U., Kunychak, G., Dutchak, O., Karpuk, L., Tatarchuk, L., Kashtanova, T., Shelenko, D., Hryhoriv, Ya., Gniezdilova, V., & Sluchyk, I. (2024). Application of biologization elements in buckwheat organic cultivation technology. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology (EEET), 25(5), 235-242. doi: 10.12912/27197050/186125.
  13. Karpenko, V.P., Mostoviak, I.I., Datsenko, A.A., Prytuliak, R.M., & Zabolotnyi, O.I. (2021). The content of photosynthetic pigments in buckwheat leaves under the influence of biological preparations. Scientific Issue Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Biology, 81(1-2), 83-89. doi: 10.25128/2078-2357.21.1-2.11.
  14. Kotykova, O.T., & Ten, I.V. (2018). Production and marketing of organic agricultural products in Ukraine. Modern Economics, 12, 106-111. doi: 10.31521/modecon.V12(2018)-16.
  15. Kuchechuk, L.V. (2022). Global food security: Trends and challenges. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism, 16, 34-40. doi: 10.26565/2310-9513-2022-16-04.
  16. Kunsook, K., Thammaboosadee, S., & Chuckpaiwong, R. (2024). Sustainable organic farming maturity model. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering & Information Technology, 14(2), 706-716. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.14.2.19504.
  17. Mazurenko, B., Novytska, N., & Honchar, L. (2020). Response of spring and facultative triticale on microbial preparation (Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus polymyxa) by different nitrogen nutrition. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 21(4), 763-774. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/21.4.2914.
  18. Meteopost. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://meteopost.com/.
  19. Oljača, S., Dolijanović, Ž., Oljača, M.V., & Djordjević, S. (2012). Effect of microbiological fertilizer and soil additive on yield of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) under high altitude conditions. Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo, 49(3), 302-306. doi: 10.5937/ratpov49-2528.
  20. Shuvar, A.M., Rudavska, N.M., Begen, L.L., & Dorota, G.M. (2019). The effect of biological preparations for seed treatment under organic buckwheat cultivation technology. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 66, 184-194.
  21. Singh, R., Babu, S., Avasthe, R.K., Yadav, G.S., Chettri, T.K., Phempunadi, C.D., & Chatterjee, T. (2015). Bacterial inoculation effect on soil biological properties, growth, grain yield, total phenolic and flavonoids contents of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) under hilly ecosystems of North-East India. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 9(15), 1110-1117. doi: 10.5897/AJMR2014.7357.
  22. Tang, Y., Wu, X., Li, C., Yang, W., Huang, M., Ma, X., & Li, S. (2017). Yield, growth, canopy traits and photosynthesis in high-yielding, synthetic hexaploid-derived wheats cultivars compared with non-synthetic wheats. Crop and Pasture Science, 68(2), 115-125. doi: 10.1071/CP16072.
  23. Tao, Y.P., Shf, Q., Zhangl, X., & Zhou, Y.N. (2004). Inoculation effect on growth and flavonoid content of Tartary buckwheat in a field experiment. Fagopyrum, 21, 45-50.
  24. Tummaramatti, S., Hegde, L., Vijaykumar, N., Chandra, J., & Narayanapur, V.B. (2016). Pot experiment: Studies on effect of bio-fertilizers on Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 22, 55-58.
  25. Vieites-Álvarez, Y., Hussain, M.I., Reigosa, M.J., Kolmanič, A., Meglič, V., Čepková, P.H., Zhou, M., Janovská, D., & Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. (2024a). Potential of different common (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) and Tartary (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) buckwheat accessions to sustainably manage surrounding weeds. European Journal of Agronomy, 153, article number 127040. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.127040.
  26. Vieites-Álvarez, Y., Reigosa, M.J., & Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. (2024b). A decade of advances in the study of buckwheat for organic farming and agroecology (2013-2023). Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, article number 1354672. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1354672.
  27. Wei, X., Xie, B., Wan, C., Song, R., Zhong, W., Xin, S., & Song, K. (2024). Enhancing soil health and plant growth through microbial fertilizers: Mechanisms, benefits, and sustainable agricultural practices. Agronomy, 14(3), article number 609. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14030609.
  28. Witkowicz, R., Skrzypek, E., Gleń-Karolczyk, K., Krupa, M., Biel, W., Chłopicka, J., & Galanty, A. (2021). Effects of application of plant growth promoters, biological control agents and microbial soil additives on photosynthetic efficiency, canopy vegetation indices and yield of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 37(4), 234-251. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2021.1918579.
  29. Zhang, Y., Guo, R., Li, S., Chen, Y., Li, Z., He, P., Huang, X., & Huang, K. (2021). Effects of continuous cropping on soil, senescence, and yield of Tartary buckwheat. Agronomy Journal, 113(6), 5102-5113. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20929.