Effect of pre-sowing seed inoculation and foliar dressing on grain productivity and symbiotic activity of chickpea plants

Maksym Honchar
Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that in the context of the rapid pace of global climate change and war in Ukraine, farmers are interested in finding modern and innovative approaches that would allow obtaining high yields and optimising acreage in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe zone, considering their reduction in those areas where sustainable chickpea grain cultivation was ensured. The purpose of the study was to substantiate and show the importance and necessity of using trace elements for foliar dressing, both in variations with and without seed inoculation. It was found that pre-sowing inoculation of chickpea seeds and the use of the trace element boron in double foliar top dressing during intensive growth (budding) and in the flowering phase at its initial stage provides a specific effect on the symbiotic activity of bacteria of the genus Rhizobium and grain productivity of chickpea plants. During pre-sowing seed treatment with bioinoculant BTU®-p and carrying out two foliar dressings in two different phases with microfertiliser Help Rost®-Boron, there was a significant increase in the weight and number of nodule bacteria, the weight of 1,000 seeds, germination energy, green mass, and plant height, which ultimately had an excellent effect on the final yield indicators of various variants compared to the control. The maximum weight and number of nodules during the research period was formed in the flowering phase, namely, at the end of this phase. The largest number of nodule bacteria was 38.2 units/plant with a weight of 625.1 mg/plant on roots and root hairs was recorded in the variant with sowing of the Triumph variety, where two foliar dressings with microfertilisers and pre-sowing seed treatment with BTU®-p inoculant were used, which as a result exceeded the control by 11.2 units/plant and 24.9 mg/plant in the same growing season of the plant. It was found that the use of pre-sowing inoculation of chickpea seeds and foliar dressing during two different phases of vegetation allowed increasing the yield to 3.07-3.18 t/ha

Keywords

nitrogen-fixing nodules; pre-sowing seed treatment; trace elements; variety; Rhizobium bacteria; growing season phases; drought resistance

Suggested citation
Honchar, M. (2025). Effect of pre-sowing seed inoculation and foliar dressing on grain productivity and symbiotic activity of chickpea plants. Plant and Soil Science, 16(2), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.31548/plant2.2025.58
References
  1. Bahan, A. (2023). The influence of growth stimulators for productivity of chickpea. In Yield and quality of crop products using modern growing technologies, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of Professor G.P. Zhemela: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical Internet conference (pp. 16-18). Poltava: Poltava Agrarian University.
  2. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/.
  3. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1973, June). Retrieved from https://cites.org/eng.
  4. Didur, I., & Temchenko, M. (2017). Study of microfertilizers and inoculants on stand density and height of plants chickpeas. Agriculture and Forestry, 6(1), 14-21.
  5. Dobrovolsky, A., Kovalenko, O., Andreychenko, L., & Koloyanidi, N. (2020). Influence of seeding methods on the duration of the growing season and productivity of chickpea varieties. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 24(4), 54-61. doi: 10.31521/2313-092X/2020-4(108)-7.
  6. Honchar, M. (2023). Research of variety resources of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Ukraine. Agrarian Innovation, 22, 31-35. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2023.22.5.
  7. Kalenska, S., & Okhota, O. (2018). Chickpeas are better than soybeans, but require knowledge of agricultural technologies. Retrieved from https://propozitsiya.com/ua/nut-luchshe-soi-notrebuet-znaniya-agrotehnologiy.
  8. Kolesnikov, M., & Kadyrov, T. (2022). Recommendation for growing of chickpea in the South condition of UkraineMelitopol: D. Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University.
  9. Koloianidi, N. (2019). Efficiency of growing of chickpea varieties a row and wide-row sowing with herbicidesTaurida Scientific Herald, 109(1), 64-69.
  10. Koloianidi, N. (2021). The effect of herbicides and sowing methods on productivity of chickpea in Southern Steppe of Ukraine(Doctoral dissertation, Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine).
  11. Kryvenko, A., Parlikokoshko, M., Chepurnykh, V., Kovalenko, N., & Orekhivsky, V. (2023). Growth and development of chickpea plants depends on food systems in the southern steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 19(3). doi: 10.31548/dopovidi3(103).2023.007.
  12. Mazur, O., & Pinchuk, N. (2022). Programming of harvest. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia National Agrarian University.
  13. Mazur, V., Didur, I., Pantsyreva, H., & Mordvaniuk, M. (2021). Economic efficiency of technological methods of growing chickpeasAgriculture and Forestry, 21, 24-33.
  14. Meteoblue. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.meteoblue.com.
  15. Mordvaniuk, M. (2019). The influence of foliar top dressing and seed inoculation on symbiotic and grain productivity of chickpea. In Innovations of modern agronomy: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference (paper ID 24274). Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia National Agrarian University.
  16. Nastiuk, A. (2023). Agroecological assessment of soil in condition of Agronomichne village to growing bioenergy cultures(Student’s qualifying work, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine).
  17. Pantsyreva, H. (2024). Effect of cultivation technology on the yield and seed quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Grain Crops, 8(1), 119-123. doi: 10.31867/2523-4544/0319.
  18. Poberezhna, L. (2023). Influence of foliar treatments and seed inoculation on symbiotic and grain productivity of chickpeas. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Rural Sciences, 132, 192-197. doi: 10.32782/2226-0099.2023.132.23.
  19. Pushchak, V. (2018). Productivity of chickpeas varieties depends on sowing rate in the conditions of the Western Forest-Step. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 28, 104-111.
  20. Rakhmentov, D., Bondarchuk, D., & Rakhmetova, S. (2023). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in the North region of Ukraine: The prospects of introduction and selection of new genotypes. In 100th anniversary of establishment of the national plant variety resources of Ukraine: Book of proceedings of the International applied science conference (pp. 91-93). Kyiv: Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination.
  21. Rakova, Y. (2021). The influence of mineral fertilizers and plant growth stimulants for chickpea yield in the conditions of the limited liability company “Agrosfera” of Pavlohrad district, Dnipropetrovsk region(Student’s thesis, Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Dnipro, Ukraine).
  22. Romanko, Y., Chervona, V., Chervonyi, Y., & Bruniov, M. (2024). Ways of ecologization of chickpea cultivation technology in the conditions of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Rural Sciences, 135(2), 61-72. doi: 10.32782/2226-0099.2024.135.2.8.
  23. Shcatula, Y., Votyk, V., & Kuzemsky, V. (2024). Formation of chickpea crop with the use of herbicides. Agriculture and Forestry, 3(34), 110-124. doi: 10.37128/2707-5826-2024-3-10.
  24. Sots, S., Kustov, I., & Butsenko, I. (2023). The features of processing of chickpea’s grain. In B. Yegorov (Ed.), Collection of abstracts of reports of the 83rd scientific conference of the university teachers (pp. 41-44). Odesa: Odesa National Technological University.
  25. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://is.gd/i4ZZuR.
  26. Tryhuba, O., Pyda, S., & Shul, O. (2024). Accumulation of vegetative mass by seedlings of Cicer arietinum L. under the influence of the composite reculfant Trevitan. In Current issues of biotechnology, ecology and nature use: Materials of the international scientific conference (pp. 137-138). Kharkiv: State Biotechnological University.